Do Libs really understand what is at stake with the Global Warming scam?
Question by rw113: Do Libs really understand what is at stake with the Global Warming scam?
The hypothesis of global warming has not been scientifically established. Data was tossed, and not compared to the original theory. A beginning point for any credible scientific study. Libs seem to feel global warming somehow relates to pollution – but do they understand the dire consequences to all humanity, from the “crisis” to the earth being alleged?
Of necessity, if global warming is true, all development, driving of cars, lighting, computer use, even television use, must be stopped. We must return to the industrialized state of living. (California is even passing laws today that limit the size of TV in a persons home). Government will need to assume absolute control over every aspect of your every day life, “to save all humanity from extension”. The liberties you once new will be gone. A form of marshal law is required to enforce and regulate the controls. Knowledge and science will once again be suppressed – for the good of all. It is like declaring that a comet is about to impact with the earth – we can stop it, but only by turning all money, resources, and control of every aspect of our life over to a New Government. With global warming scam, Government will need to eliminate all privacy laws, so they can decide and enforce what we are permitted to do, and what we are not permitted to do, with right of enforcement by inspection . . . Only the Elite will be permitted means of transportation, lighting, use of electronics, etc. If the claim is true, these are all necessary consequences to be able to “save the earth”.
Best answer:
Answer by Dad411
No, no they do not.
Give your answer to this question below!
Q&A: Can a life be saved? Or is it really a prolonging of the inevitable?
Question by Terry S: Can a life be saved? Or is it really a prolonging of the inevitable?
I mean everyone is going to die at some point in time. No matter the action taken death is certain in the end.
So can anyone claim to have saved a life? When I had CABG done last year, was my life saved or did the doctors only extend my life by an unknown length of time? Since no one can say when or what the cause of my death will be was any change made at all?
Are we lying to ourselves with the phrase “life saving”? Should we really call it “life extension”, “putting of death” or maybe just “life quality improvement”? Or is it just wishful thinking?
These are philosophical questions I know. I just wanted some other thoughts.
It seems that some took my question in a way I didn’t intend. I am currently without a job and haveing some problem finding one. I have a lot of time to think about my life and where I’m headed. I have done things in my past that hurt many people (more than 15 years ago). I made changes in that aspect that I am very proud of. But I feel a bit down right now and am re-evaluating the worth of my life. My health conditions do not help me (see my profile). I just want to set things right as much as I can. I will never undo what I did. It seems I can’t forgive myself. I just wonder what to do to next.
Best answer:
Answer by David R
I think they mean they saved some amount of life. Just like “saving gas” doesn’t mean you never have to tank your car up again. I don’t think anyone expects to live forever after having CPR performed on them. I don’t think we need to be reminded at every step that we are mortal – “Happy birthday Johnnie! Too bad you’re going to DIE!!!” Best.
Give your answer to this question below!